Is consciousness fundamental reddit

Is consciousness fundamental reddit. The challenge with asserting that consciousness is fundamental is getting across the immense chasm between fundamental consciousness, and the kind of consciousness we actually experience. A general reminder for the OP: please remember to include a TL; DR and to clarify what you mean by "consciousness" The most compelling reason to think that consciousness is fundamental, IMO, is due to the hard problem of consciousness. Like the brain literally ensuring to breath. My eye twitches every time I read a quantified account of exactly how much silicon processing power is needed to simulate a human brain/mind (it's almost inevitably assumed that one is identical to the other) Yet, its fundamental nature, the 'water,' remains unaltered whether it is in the ocean, a river, or isolated as a droplet. Consciousness is a fundamental property of the universe and is neither physical nor mental and by being neither makes definition difficult through science alone. So, it would be helpful for everyone if you could say what you mean by "consciousness" in order to avoid confusion. "It plays on the concept that at the fundamental level, everything is energy and that consciousness is not just a byproduct but a central force. Similarly, the consciousness in humans, animals, or even machines, if it comes to pass, arises from the same universal source. Your added question contains a contradiction and needs to be revised. currently, we lack a physical explanation for the existence of consciousness. This is somewhat analogous to the combination problem in panpsychism. " Space-time emerges from consciousness but not in the meta-physical way that proponents believe. Awareness is, one could argue, the more "active" realization that this object (or ourselves) is present or in a certain condition. So while we can scientifically show that some functions reside within the brain, we counterintuitively cannot yet conclude that we have found the If you change the word "consciousness" to "intelligence" in your post, then it works (sort of). Our understanding of consciousness is only complete, when modelled as a basic building block, adhering to the laws of evolution highlighting the ‘birth, transformation, growth-maturity, decay and death’, of consciousness, together with ‘degrees of consciousness in all its transformation stages. When i see consciousness as fundamental i have trouble seeing many conscious agents. It just sucks that we don't know something so fundamental. Reply reply "It plays on the concept that at the fundamental level, everything is energy and that consciousness is not just a byproduct but a central force. They are examples of "easy problems" of consciousness. Jan 14, 2020 · According to panpsychism, consciousness pervades the universe and is a fundamental feature of it. Consciousness in a psychological sense is just behavior that requires additional tools to understand. Consciousness is not fundamental, but it appears that all living organisms, with enough time, will evolve consciousness, as consciousness is selected for because it better increases your odds at survival, so in that way it is probably universal to life (again, given enough time). A place to discuss Sam Harris and to have difficult conversations with civility. Similarly, we only experience the universe through our consciousness. The fundamental issue of consciousness is that we don’t even know if consciousness does reside in the brain matter, because we don’t know if consciousness is the kind of thing that can be found. In recent decades, the scientific study of consciousness has significantly increased our understanding of this elusive phenomenon. It’s some random facts that seem related to consciousness. This is not at all an understanding of consciousness. You've moved away from talking about consciousness and onto super special consciousness that can't be quantified because it's too special. How does it do it. Retreating to quoting passages from old dead guys. Consciousness is a fundamental truth. Vijñāna is an emergent property, but the nature or dharmatā of vijñāna is not emergent. Mar 12, 2023 · Yes, consciousness is fundamental. This is why neuroscience, psychology, physics, chemistry, biology, history, sociology and anthropology to name a few disciplines all play a role in it's description. Members Online Welcome to r/AnomalousEvidence! A place for researchers and experiencers to discuss, share, and catalog a wide range of anomalous activity. there is nothing mysterious or supernatural about consciousness it's just the brain. The difference lies in the level of self-awareness and the manifestation of this consciousness. Consciousness may allow us to exert top-down control or at least gain insight into why we act as we do. With your brain dying, you die, but there would still be an expriencing subject, but it wouldn't be the you that you know right now as aJrenalin, for example. The contents of the larger consciousness could also be changing, for instance say a Gaia like consciouness sees the whole earth changing. We cannot remove ourselves from the equation any more than we can occupy space and be alive and self aware without this meatsuit that is affixed to our being. This doesn’t mean that literally everything is conscious. This temporary nature of consciousness is underscored by the phenomena of near-death experiences (NDEs). If consciousness is fundamental, it’s fundamental, if not, it’s not. As it stands now the question is equivalent to: if consciousness is fundamental, what happens if scientists prove it is not fundamental. It is what happens when we homo sapiens do what we've evolved to do, with all the complexity, blinding speed, and raw processing power we have available to us. Home to experienced apologists of both sides, biology professionals and casual observers, there is no sub with more comprehensive coverage on the subject. Tl;dr Consciousness is not an entity, or a fundamental force, or indeed the ground of all being (which in any case amounts to an epistemological claim, and not an ontological one). Consciousness creating understanding of an external world vs consciousness being more fundamental than the external world. It's that you're here, now. All states in our consciousness depends directly or indirectly on states in the objective reality. Consciousness may continue after death, because if we are part of a unified consciousness, then this consciousness would continue when the physical aspects of our existence end. The whole topic of consciousness inspires so much nonsense, even from highly educated people. As for whether consciousness would still be fundamental if it had never existed, my position is that consciousness is part of what it means to exist. Existence feels a certain way and that is all. People with intellectual disabilities and split-brain patients are good examples of this. If the world is primarily ideas, then the idea of fundamental consciousness completely recontextualizes self, reality, and the roles each play. Just because consciousness is a ubiquitous component of our experiences, it doesn't mean that consciousness is a fundamental component of the universe; it merely means that consciousness is a fundamental component of our perception of the universe. It's neural pathways firing off in different parts of the brain. Fundamental is that which can cannot be further simplified or reduced. Consciousness is one of the ideas which has baffled best of best biologists. Phenomenal Consciousness ('P-Consciousness') is the raw feeling of experiencing. phenomenal consciousness: the concept that it feels like something to be something Ah. Thank you That5HeadGuy for posting on r/consciousness, below are some general reminders for the OP and the r/consciousness community as a whole. I believe consciousness is a more universal thing- there is one mind that is expressed identically in each sentient being The issue is that the English term “consciousness” is generally used to translate vijñāna which is an afflicted and dualistic consciousness, and vijñāna is not fundamental, it is a byproduct of the causes and conditions of ignorance and grasping. Consciousness in an ethical sense seems to just be communication plus a bunch of bs to pretend it isn’t just that. mosified gravity: no new stuff, but you modify existing fundamental laws. So, fundamental laws can be modified, new existents can be necessary. If consciousness is a fundamental property of our universe, why is it localised to brains? When a brain is damaged, its organism's consciousness is affected. The term "consciousness" is used to express many different concepts. Throw in an attention mechanism that identifies the largest self need and isolates the relevant sensor inputs to satiate that need and you have a system that has consciousness like a human has consciousness. The premise is that consciousness is fundamental, all encompassing, infinite, the foundation of which reality is built upon. In other words, consciousness prevents the "paradox of nothingness". Once you're ready, you are able to let go of your ego momentarily, to re-experience the wholeness of being one. dark matter/dark energy: our present fundamental laws stay the same, new stuff is posited. It challenges the notion of AI as mere algorithms and transistors, suggesting a kinship with the human condition through energy. the way in which the absolute goes to prison is consciousness. Instincts and choices don't require consciousness. That would be misunderstanding what people mean when they say consciousness "arises". Consciousness in a purely scientific sense? Nonexistent, or at best arbitrary taxonomy of behavior. This does not automatically include the practice of awareness or practice of being conscious. There can never be no conscious observers anywhere. If this were extensive rather than a random fact associated with consciousness then it would mean we know that objects without neural pathways cannot have consciousness. What is the argument for Consciousness changes -> Existence of larger consciousness? Maybe you mean contents of consciousness change (also lets bracket the issue of whether change requires a cause). I'm surprised by the high numbers of "consciousness is fundamental". As it stands, it doesn't. As part of consciousness the brain produce an experience that synthesize sensory input. I think its super important differentiate the theories of space-time with the existence of a reality outside our mind. This seems to me a fundamental disagreement at the very starting point where the panpsychist takes for granted (for good reasons) that there is phenomenal consciousness and try to make place for it in a coherent manner even if that doesn't lead to "explaining" consciousness (the motivation isn't to explain it necessarily, but to make a place Reddit's premier debate venue for the evolution versus creationism controversy. That which exists is that which has an effect on consciousness. Saying that a "perspective vector" is a "fundamental force" is literally meaningless. It's the movie that plays inside you. Consciousness is not like a bunch of fucking microscopic magnetic moments that become aligned in macroscopic objects to form a macroscopic magnetization, that's just silly. Is the universe really all inside your head, asks Michael Brooks. Regardless, what I refer to as consciousness could still be the delayed product of the environment. Consequently, this sometimes leads to individuals talking past one another since they are using the term "consciousness" differently. The fundamental status of consciousness is necessary for Science to be the means by which universal theories are identified and observed. When you add consciousness to the equation you suddenly have the formula 0=1 and the dream begins. That is intentionality. It doesn't mean that it is temporally created. The Hindu story of creation explains how this ‘God/Consciousness’ might undergo the process of indivuation through a series of reductions, wherein the Can consciousness be explained from fundamental physical laws? As someone with a background in Physics, it has always seemed to me like consciousness is the one thing that seems completely disconnected from the fundamental laws of the Universe that governs everything else. Consciousness being fundamental does not entail consciousness having a will. If consciousness is fundamental, but no conscious experience we thus far concretely know to exist is, I really don't know what you're calling fundamental aside from some completely conjectured notion of consciousness. Perhaps when the fundamental forces are perfectly balanced reality could go one way or the other - the multiverse I guess. Explanation: This perspective posits that consciousness is inherent to the fabric of the universe, akin to fundamental properties such as quantum fields. Consciousness stuff is subject to universal laws just like matter, so the experiences are shaped by these natural laws. Here you will find news, updates, theories and evidence related to Aliens, UFOs, Fringe Science, Consciousness and OBEs, Cryptids, Poltergeists, and any anomalous data/experiences people may have for independent and open-minded scientific analysis! 103K subscribers in the samharris community. but in deep sleep or deep meditation / altered states the body is free from the prison of self consciousness having only left a minimal Consciousness is a system function to acquire energy and take specific actions to preserve the persistence of the self. Yet, despite critical development in our understanding of the functional side of consciousness, we still lack a fundamental theory regarding its phenomenal aspect. To be conscious is to be present and have other things be present to us. " With that being true, it stands to reason that the laws of physics should bend to the will of consciousness, and there would be no reason for consciousness to be limited by "It plays on the concept that at the fundamental level, everything is energy and that consciousness is not just a byproduct but a central force. Sep 25, 2023 · The concept proposes that consciousness is a fundamental aspect of reality, like mass or electrical charge. Personally i have been going back and forth on this (consciousness beeing fundamental) for a while now. It seems that consciousness is fundamental to existence, because without it the singularity is just nothingness. Why does the consciousness of an organism depend on the proper function of the brain? But there is the fundamental consciousness, and that is still there whether you are alive or not, and your consciousness is part of that bigger consciousness. This fundamental force of consciousness is what some people would call God. 2. The idea goes back to antiquity—Plato took it seriously—and has had some prominent Sep 26, 2012 · Some theories hold that reality and consciousness are one and the same. Rather, it asks about the relationship between consciousness and the physical world. Is consciousness everywhere? Is it fundamental? Is it emergent? Is panpsychism true? If so, then is suffering inevitable? If so, then what intensity? Just what makes suffering possible in physics is an important question for ethics and Efilism, since consciousness is the seat of value. " No. Consciousness, rather than being a fundamental or eternal aspect of our existence akin to a "soul," can be understood as a transient phenomenon arising from the intricate interplay of our anatomy and the electrical processes within our brains. Jesus Christ just get an actual degree in physics and you'll look back on this and laugh. If i had to guess from the replied/posts i've used to read i would have guessed 90% would reply "not fundamental". So the For discussion of the scientific study of consciousness, as well as related philosophy. This revolutionary view posits that consciousness, akin to gravity or electromagnetism, forms a basic building block of reality. Consciousness is not fundamental nor irreducible. Things such as reincarnation/other realms are still pure speculation in this case - there's only the premise of continuation. Panpsychists, on the other hand, treat phenomenal consciousness to be fundamental intrinsic feature of fundamental elements of physics -- thus, phenomenal consciousness per se never truly emerge, only complex structured variants of it emerge based on different neurophysiological arrangements. But because they look the same they are sublated into one universe from the point of view of a fundamental consciousness that joins the two (just like the brain). It also appears the universe has a sort of self sustaining-self organizing type of intelligence, at its most basic, things evolve, adapt, grow and change, structures and networks form, chemistry and cells organize Forget consciousness, there are much complex things if we forget about consciousness. Consciousness is an emergent property from complex interactions of other properties. Pretty much all analytic philosophers, cognitive scientists, behaviourists and AI researchers say that consciousness is just a bunch of hardware, and the mind is software. Aug 11, 2022 · A Relativistic Theory of Consciousness. A-Consciousness is your associative and analogical ability to comprehend your present world in terms of your past world. The brain has evolved as a part of the nerve system to process sensory data and to prepare and coordinate actions. It could merely be the nature of existence. The sense of an individuated self that you experience is a reduction of the fundamental force of consciousness. But I watched a Ted talk dennett gave about consciousness being an illusion, and yet all of his examples were how our brain can get fooled by illusions in the contents of consciousness, which seemed not to be hitting at the issue of consciousness itself being an illusion, so I hope his book is clearer about this than the talk was. Consciousness is a fundamental property of the universe. We sure as hell didn't teach our brain to make us breath when we were born. TL;DR: Premise: Consciousness is a fundamental force of the universe, language is the medium through which it travels and our brains are simply tapping into a universal consciousness rather than generating our own separate consciousnesses, like an a laptop picking up a Wi-Fi signal. I do share quiet a few aspects of his vieuw of the universe and he almost won me over in the end. However, the sublation is never 100%, the two-sidedness is revealed by the apparent dualism in the word that see reality separated due to a necessary relativity. " I'm not sure if consciousness is "Fundamental" to reality, whatever it may be, but our biological apparatus is absolutely fundamental to the equation in which we are a part of. Hence consciousness is more fundamental than awareness, if looked at from that perspective. Within the expansive framework of a Unified Theory of Everything, consciousness emerges not as a mere by product of complex interactions but as a fundamental property of the universe, akin to mass, charge, or space-time. Whatever the implications of this are, it has to do with our mind is and what we can do with it. " It's no different than the fundamental nature of time, wave/particle duality, spooky action at a distance, the origin of the cosmos, or metaphysical uncertainty These are all aspects of the more basic and inexplicable ineffability of being, and the people who endeavor to contemplate consciousness on a supposedly intellectual or analytic basis It could even be supposed that consciousness is not merely a component of all matter, but that the material is actually the same as consciousness -- that consciousness is what is ultimately fundamental, generating its own mediums via its own abstractive information-processing (forming initial information perhaps as arbitrarily as we imagine the So, if consciousness fundamental, then it is "of central importance" and the "primary rule or principle on which something [in this case, all of physical reality] is based. Consciousness is the universe's mechanism for ensuring that there isn't nothing. . nkqzu zld hxy fixjb vrqz yypkeqz hghjt yabxsv oidtox mkyinvp